According to the newly published Microsoft documentation, Windows 11 is not compatible with Intel and AMD CPUs sold four years ago. this is, TPM 1.2 and 2.0 issues already described.
Intel: As of 4:30 pm Eastern Standard Time on 6/25, core CPUs prior to Coffee Lake are not supported. This includes all 6th and 7th generation CPUs. I really feel sick for those who bought the Core i7-7700K. Intel HEDT CPUs prior to Cascade Lake are not supported.
AMD: Currently, Windows 11 is not compatible with CPUs in the bulldozer era. It doesn’t seem to be compatible with the 1st generation Threadripper system. 2400G and 2200G are supported, but 3400G and 3200G are supported. Ryzen 1700X, 1800X, and all related CPUs are not supported.
I’d like to explicitly leave room here because of the idea that Microsoft will add CPUs to its support list, but recent updates to its PC Health Check app seem to make that less likely. .. Microsoft wrote about it last night, so it updated its PC health check application. I ran the test on multiple machines. On some PCs like me, the new error message looks like this:
Jamie Lendino, Editor-in-Chief of ExtremeTech, is currently running a Core i7-6900K. The message on his PC (confirmed by David Cardinal and Michael Kan of PCMag, which also has an older CPU) looks like this:
My machine has been warned that I need the TPM 2.0 module. On their PC, their CPU is said to be incompatible with Windows 11. All of them have Intel CPUs that date back more than four years.
I couldn’t think of a better subheading, even if it wasn’t the most specialized on the planet.Last night I thought Microsoft created a real bugbear for myself confusion There is no clear answer as to whether TPM 2.0 or 1.2 is required to install Windows 11 and whether TPM 1.2 is actually sufficient to install Win 11. It has been specified that my PC requires TPM 2.0 modules / support. 1.2 Module / Support.
As of today, the TPM problem is buried in the problem that “people who bought a PC two to four years ago can’t run Windows 11.” I underestimate the problem, except that I even say “four years ago.” Just 579 days ago, at the time of this writing, the Core i9-9980XE was the fastest Intel CPU available for consumer products. Currently, the Core i9-9980XE is not listed as a CPU that supports Windows 11.
Microsoft has never done this, as far as I can remember. This does not mean that the company has not previously changed the minimum hardware requirements, or that those requirements do not exclude people who may have been able to run the operating system. There is. However, Microsoft has never declared that it is not allowed to upgrade a vast area of the existing CPU market to the latest version of the operating system. Core i9-9980XE is less than 2 years.
AMD announced the first 64-bit consumer CPU on September 23, 2003. On June 24, 2021, Microsoft announced that the next version of the operating system will be 64-bit only. It took Microsoft 18 years to make that leap. But when it came to locking out a $ 2,000 CPU, it took just under two years.
In the true case, this confuses beliefs. Six years after forcing end users to adopt Windows 10 by deploying dark patterns and malware-style tactics, Microsoft says Microsoft can’t run the latest operating systems for anyone with a PC older than the minimum age. It seems that it was decided. The very annoying part is that Microsoft praised its own seamless upgrade offer on stage. This was Windows 10.
Microsoft requires PC OEMs to ship TPM-compatible hardware from 2016, but some HEDT PCs manufactured in 2019 may have Windows 11 disabled. Most of these systems are from major companies such as Boxx, Lenovo, Dell and HP.
This kind of requirement is a perversion of people’s understanding of the meaning of “minimum specifications”. The minimum specifications are assumed to be the minimum specifications required to run the product. If you fill them all together, the software will work. The minimum specifications serve as a way for end users to measure the impact of the passage of time. When Microsoft said that a 1GHz CPU was enough to run Windows 10, it actually meant that “most CPUs dating back to 2000 can run Windows 10.”
But that no longer means Microsoft’s minimum specifications. It seems to mean, “If the system has been built in the last few years, the OS will run on slower hardware.” This was a big change compared to the way Microsoft OS features were previously communicated, and the company didn’t do much. remark From the stage to it.
Updated list or clear announcement, or something Microsoft has shown that it doesn’t really believe that it can disable the upgrade path for tens of millions of PC owners who haven’t purchased a new CPU in the last two to four years. There is no point in this. It’s actually easy to believe that it’s a huge communication failure, as opposed to the decisive attempt to ban the upgrades of current Windows users for five to seven years.
But whether it’s an error or not, I support what I wrote earlier today. If Microsoft had tried, Microsoft would not have been able to more effectively thwart its own launch. I misunderstood that Microsoft ran out of ways to surprise me when the OS went on sale. surprised.
https://www.extremetech.com/computing/324157-windows-11-may-not-run-on-early-ryzen-threadripper-skylake-x-or-any-intel-systems-2016 Windows 11 may not work on Early Ryzen, Threadripper, Skylake-X, or pre-2016 Intel PCs