Musk’s vision of freedom of speech for Twitter faces the “obstacle” of online safety bills

Following the $ 44 billion acquisition of social media networks, Elon Musk’s plans to make Twitter a “free speech” hub face “imminent obstacles” from the online security bill proposed by the UK government. There is a possibility.

“Freedom of speech is the foundation of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is a digital town square where issues essential to humanity’s future are discussed,” Musk said last month when he announced a contract to buy Twitter.

But the UK’s polarized online safety bill Introduced to Congress in MarchFacebook, Google, Twitter and other big tech companies.

If the bill is passed, social media companies could be fined up to 10% of global sales for failing to protect users from harmful content. In the worst breach, social media executives can face up to two years in prison.

A government spokesman for the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sports has revealed that Twitter is fully responsible for violating online law if freedom of speech is prioritized over harm to users.

“Twitter and all social media platforms need to protect users from harm to the site,” a spokeswoman said. UKTN.

“We are introducing a new online safety law to protect children, prevent abuse and protect freedom of speech. All tech companies with users in the UK will comply with the new law. Or you will be fined a lot and your site will need to be blocked. “

The government says the bill protects freedom of speech, but critics have warned that if Twitter relaxes its content moderation policy, it could violate the proposed law.

Musk “For censorship far beyond the law”

“Twitter will be very difficult to operate in the UK if we try to operate it on a completely free speech, zero rule basis,” said Imran Ahmed, CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate. ..

“The vision of free speech will run into imminent obstacles,” said Matthew Resch, head of public policy at the Institute of Economic Research, a free market think tank.

Lesh said: “The online safety bill mandates a platform that actively monitors user content and facilitates censorship. Companies are emotionally out of” malicious expression “under the threat of billions of pounds of fines. You need to remove anything that could be illegal, even content that is painful.

“This makes it easy for offended malicious attackers to drive the removal of speeches.”

Gavin Miller QC Said Times The online security bill does not include the statutory safeguards needed to prevent or limit the risk of infringement. [to free speech]”.

Musk is a self-proclaimed “absolutist of free speech,” but also states that he “opposes censorship far beyond the law.”

He added: “If people want to reduce their freedom of speech, they will ask the government to pass a law to that effect. Therefore, going beyond the law is against the will of the people.

Conservative Julian Knight wrote to Musk this week Inviting Tesla and SpaceX CEOs to London Discuss the future of Twitter. Musk’s vision of freedom of speech for Twitter faces the “obstacle” of online safety bills

Back to top button