Legal complaints filed against Clearview AI in five countries

Face recognition: Legal complaints filed against Clearview AI in five countries

Five Europeans said Thursday that privacy campaigners unknowingly obtained 3 billion facial images from the web against U.S. tech firm Clearview AI in violation of the GDPR and other regulations. I have filed a series of legal complaints with the regulator.

Based in New York, Clearview AI sells facial recognition software to law enforcement agencies and businesses.Its customer list includes banks, governments, many US police, and Metropolitan Police Department.

The company built a machine learning model using data obtained from the public web from sites such as Instagram and Facebook. Early investors raised a total of $ 17 million in shares, including: Palantir Chief Peter Thiel and Kirenaga Partners, but face multiple legal challenges.

In 2020, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube threatened to file proceedings against the company if the company did not stop its practice, and Clearview AI faced multiple privacy proceedings in the United States and elsewhere. The Swedish government fined police for identifying a person using Clearview’s software and stopped operations in Canada after being told to remove images of Canadian citizens. Four campaign groups (Privacy International, nyob, Hermes Center for Transparency and Digital Human Rights, Homo Digitalis) have joined four EU regulators and a UK ICO on Thursday, claiming they are not active in the EU. I filed a complaint.

The petitioner said that facial photo collection and biometrics represent the mass processing of personal data of European residents, which is illegal under the GDPR, and Clearview has a legitimate basis for collecting this data. It states that there is no.

They also claim that the use of Clearview tools by law enforcement authorities violates EU law enforcement directives that have been replaced by law by Member States.

“The use of such invasive and privately developed facial recognition databases that enable law enforcement to provide social media intelligence is not legal, necessary and proportional,” he said. Privacy International website..

Regulators have three months to respond to complaints.

A case similar to this one highlights the difference between the general perception of the “public Web” and the uses in which the information and personal data found there may be used legally.

Lucie Audibert, PI’s Legal Officer, said: And the freedom it enables. “

Clearview CEO Hoan Ton-That said in a statement that the company does not operate in Europe. “Clearview AI has never signed a contract with EU customers and is currently unavailable to EU customers,” he said.

In April, the EU made a drastic proposal Prohibit the use of face recognition technology For “high risk” applications, including deployment in public places. Legal complaints filed against Clearview AI in five countries

Back to top button