E-waste excluded from the COP26 agenda

The International Data Disinfection Consortium (IDSC) has called on COP26 President Arokshama to include e-waste on the agenda of the Climate Summit and missed the opportunity to promote its exclusion in the circular economy. I called.

According to the United Nations (UN) Global Electronic Waste Monitor 2020, E-waste is the world’s fastest growing domestic waste stream, producing a record 53.6 million metric tonnes (Mt) in 2019 alone. By 2030, the world’s e-waste is projected to reach 74 Mt per year.

Founded in 2017 to standardize terminology and practices throughout the data sanitization industry, IDSC said: Open letter To Sharma The world’s second largest producer of e-waste per capita, The UK has the opportunity to set an example in this area.

“As Chairman of COP26, your role in ensuring that the UK is a leader in promoting a more environmentally friendly and more sustainable waste management model is an important model for addressing climate emergencies. “Policies and incentives,” he added, adding that the UK government’s Net Zero strategy and Tenpoint Green Plan have completely ignored electronic waste.

“This missed the opportunity to promote involvement in the circular economy,” he continued. “While current government strategies outline the intent of creating solutions that reduce emissions, opportunities to promote and encourage the reuse and recycling of rare materials and functional products have been overlooked.

“Pursuing renewable energy sources and reducing CO2 emissions is a global urgent task, but the UK Government roadmap suggests that this will take time. Working on electronic waste Implementation of a sustainable model can be done in the near future and needs to be seriously considered. “

In addition, the UK Government called on both organizations and consumers to provide guidance on how to move away from their current attitudes towards used electronics and IT equipment. This allows the item to be simply discarded and replaced rather than reused or recycled.

Part of this guidance should consider reforming data sanitization policies with the goal of implementing the right data management practices so that IT equipment can be reused, refurbished, or recycled without data security concerns. I added that there is.

“We at IDSC believe that there is a clear link between data protection technology, e-waste reduction and the growth of the circular economy,” he said. “Data regulations and public sector policies do not recommend the reuse of assets that contain data, so organizations are largely uncertain about how they can engage in the circular economy.

“Please help us with this letter to address the issue of e-waste immediately and raise awareness of the need to unleash the potential of the circular economy. Opportunity to meet with you to discuss this in more detail. Welcome. “

Adam Read, Chairman of the Certified Waste Management Authority (CIWM), also Explained that there is no e-waste on the COP26 agenda As “important oversight,” we also call on global leaders to recognize the important role that recycling and resource management must play in supporting decarbonization.

Formerly Secretary-General, Sharma was appointed President of COP26 in January 2021 but retains his ministerial status. Computer Weekly asked Sharma and the Cabinet Office for comment, but did not respond by the time of publication. IDSC added that he had not received approval either.

E-waste is a top priority for IT professionals

according to Individual survey of IT industry The end of e-waste, implemented by BCS for COP26, was the top answer from IT experts when asked about the technology-related actions that governments and businesses need to implement first.

After e-waste (30%), respondents said carbon transparency report (19%) Make your data center truly “green” (14%) As the first action to be taken. An additional 61% said they were not confident that digital technology was being used effectively against climate change, and 64% said the UK workforce now has the right digital skills to achieve NetZero. He expressed concern about not doing so.

Alex Bardell, Chair of BCS Green, said: IT specialist group. “If the starter motor breaks down in your car, you will go to the garage and get new parts instead of chucking the car.

“The challenge is that the business model of electronics companies pushes products such as smartphones in a shorter time cycle than ever before as a way to generate revenue, and it doesn’t really have to be this way. To get ahead of the tougher upgrade cycle, we need to combine political, social and commercial will. “

BCS Vice-Chair John Booth said: So far limited, but I hope it will be faster than slower. “

In March 2021, IDSC’s Fredrik Forslund told Computer Weekly: Implementing an appropriate data sanitization process using audit trails It helps tech companies reuse their IT equipment by increasing their confidence that they can redeploy their devices without the risk of privacy breaches.

He added that tech companies need to work together in the supply chain to standardize on “ecolabels.” It works like food packaging materials, allowing businesses to know exactly what materials are in IT equipment and how they are recycled.This is important because many rare earth metals used in electronics can be produced. Toxic waste If not handled correctly.

EAC survey

November 2020, Survey by the British Environmental Audit Board (EAC) finds that most of the waste is not properly treated and that countries lag behind other countries in incorporating small electronic devices into the circular economy for use, reuse and recycling. Did.

“Many of them are landfilled, incinerated, or dumped abroad. Under current law, electronic waste producers and retailers are responsible for this waste, but apparently they are not.” EAC said that about 40% of UK e-waste is being sent abroad.

Major online retailers, such as Amazon, are involved in the circular economy “against all alleged sustainability protests” by not collecting or recycling electronics like other types of organizations. I added that I am avoiding.

“Especially given the tremendous increase in sales from online vendors, especially during this year’s coronavirus outbreak, EAC collects products in online marketplaces, pays for recycling, and sells to real retailers. We want to create a place of equal competition that producers do not sell. Platform. “

EAC also “makes repairs nearly impossible” by gluing and soldering internal components while real producers of electronic products, such as Apple, have deliberately shortened product life. I found that. This gives the consumer little control over the device. They own it.

“They can’t retrieve the components for their own repairs, nor can they access the manual on how to fix the problem,” he said. “Instead, it’s more economical to replace the item completely, especially as Apple’s suggested repairs can be very expensive.”

While the UK is introducing Right to repair the law In March 2021, smartphones and laptops, which are the main products causing the problem even though they include an “electronic display”, are not covered. E-waste excluded from the COP26 agenda

Back to top button