We’ve put together all the information Apple has provided and detailed a complete breakdown of both processors. So here’s everything you need to know about the Apple A15 and Apple M1 showdown without any further effort.
The M1 is made for Mac and the A15 is made for phones
Meanwhile, the newly announced A15 Bionic is built inside the iPhone 13, iPhone 13 Pro, and iPad Mini 6, making it basically smaller and more portable than a laptop. The M1 may perform faster, but the A15 focuses on battery life.
However, it’s not so clear, as Apple also has an M1 processor in its latest M1 processor. iPad Pro Tablet. This means that whenever Apple wants to improve performance to the level of entry-level laptops, it looks like it’s happy to use the M1 outside the scope of the Mac.
They use a completely different architecture
Comparing the Apple A15 Bionic with the Apple M1 processor is a bit like comparing apples and oranges.Even though both chips are based arm, They use different architectures. This means that even with the same number of CPU and GPU cores, performance can vary significantly.
Both the Apple A15 Bionic processor and the Apple M1 processor use the 5nm manufacturing process, but the number of transistors varies from 15 billion and 16 billion, respectively. The higher the number of transistors, the faster the performance in general, which is an advantage for the Apple M1.
A15 prioritizes battery over performance
As mentioned earlier, comparing cores reveals a lot only if the processors are using different architectures. That said, the balance between Apple’s high-performance cores and energy-efficient cores reveals a lot about the differences between the Apple A15 and the Apple M1.
Apple Bionic has a total of six CPU cores, consisting of two high-performance cores and four energy-efficient cores. The Apple M1 has eight CPU cores, four high-performance cores and four energy-efficient cores.
|Apple A15 Bionic||Apple M1|
|Energy efficient core||2||Four|
|High performance core||Four||Four|
This shows that Apple is clearly prioritizing battery life for all devices with A15 chips, while the M1 is trying to strike an equal balance in both performance and battery life. This makes a lot of sense, as battery life is generally more important for smartphones than for laptops.
M1 has more firepower for graphics
It’s not worth being tied to the number of graphics cores. There are many details that need to be considered to understand how performance differs. Still, given the intended use of the M1, it’s definitely a great chip for GPU-focused workloads such as video editing and gameplay.
|Apple A15 Bionic||Apple M1|
One of the most interesting aspects of the Apple A15 Bionic is copying the same tactics as the M1 and disabling the lower core. This also means that despite all these devices using the Apple A15 Bionic chip, the iPhone 13 Pro and iPad Mini Pro have one additional GPU core compared to the iPhone 13 and iPhone 13 Mini.
https://www.trustedreviews.com/versus/apple-a15-vs-apple-m1-4167752?utm_source=keystone&utm_medium=keystone_core_reviews_rss&utm_campaign=trusted+reviews Apple A15 and Apple M1: How are the two chips compared?